Decision expected on Edward Colston statue plaque

[ad_1]

There has been disagreement about the wording of the new plaque intended for the plinth which previously held the Edward Colston statue

Getty Images Empty stone plinth, with ornate metal detailing on the corners, and metal plaques on the flat sides, which cannot be read in the image. Lots of tall buildings in the background and two people wearing warm clothes. A large tree is on the left of the image, and it has no leaves, indicating it is winter. — There has been disagreement about the wording of the new plaque intended for the plinth which previously held the Edward Colston statue

The wording for a new plaque on the empty plinth where a controversial slave trader’s statue used to stand could soon be approved.

Protesters tore down the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol on 7 June 2020 and threw it into the harbour.

Last February, a city council committee approved planning permission for the plaque on the condition that the proposed wording was changed to reflect Colston’s acts in the slave trade.

The development control B committee will vote on granting planning permission for the latest version of the plaque next Wednesday.

The Colston statue was pulled down and thrown into Bristol harbour in 2020

A metal statue of a man in a long coat with long hair being lowered on ropes over the side of a harbour, towards the water. There are hundreds of people visible watching. — The Colston statue was pulled down and thrown into Bristol harbour in 2020

The Local Democracy Reporting Service reports that the proposed wording now reads: “On 13 November 1895, a statue of Edward Colston (1636 – 1721) was unveiled here.

“In the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, the celebration of Colston was increasingly challenged given his prominent role in the enslavement of African people.

“On 7 June 2020, the statue was pulled down during Black Lives Matter protests and rolled into the harbour.

“Following consultation with the city in 2021, the statue entered the collections of Bristol City Council’s museums.”

The latest wording removes the words “celebrating him as a city benefactor” from the first sentence, which some members of the committee objected to.